In a previous blog post we learned how to use DataVariable and DataVariables to test asynchronous code. Spock also provides PollingConditions as a way to test asynchronous code. The PollingConditions class has the methods eventually and within that accept a closure where we can write our assertions on the results of the asynchronous code execution. Spock will try to evaluate conditions in the closure until they are true. By default the eventually method will retry for 1 second with a delay of 0.1 second between each retry. We can change this by setting the properties timeout, delay, initialDelay and factor of the PollingConditions class. For example to define the maximum retry period of 5 seconds and change the delay between retries to 0.5 seconds we create the following instance: new PollingConditions(timeout: 5, initialDelay: 0.5).
Instead of changing the PollingConditions properties for extending the timeout we can also use the method within and specify the timeout in seconds as the first argument. If the conditions can be evaluated correctly before the timeout has expired then the feature method of our specification will also finish earlier. The timeout is only the maximum time we want our feature method to run.

Testing asynchronous code needs some special treatment. With synchronous code we get results from invoking method directly and in our tests or specifications we can easily assert the value. But when we don’t know when the results will be available after calling a method we need to wait for the results. So in our specification we actually block until the results from asynchronous code are available. One of the options Spock provides us to block our testing code and wait for the code to be finished is using the classes DataVariable and DataVariables. When we create a variable of type DataVariable we can set and get one value result. The get method will block until the value is available and we can write assertions on the value as we now know it is available. The set method is used to assign a value to the BlockingVariable, for example we can do this in a callback when the asynchronous method support a callback parameter.

The BlockingVariable can only hold one value, with the other class BlockingVariables we can store multiple values. The class acts like a Map where we create a key with a value for storing the results from asynchronous calls. Each call to get the value for a given key will block until the result is available and ready to assert.

If we write specification where we need to use files and directories we can use the @TempDir annotation on a File or Path instance variable. By using this annotation we make sure the file is created in the directory defined by the Java system property java.io.tmpdir. We could overwrite the temporary root directory using Spock configuration if we want, but the default should be okay for most situations. The @TempDir annotation can actually be used on any class that has a constructor with a File or Path argument. Since Spock 2.2 we can use the FileSystemFixture class provided by Spock. With this class we have a nice DSL to create directory structures and files in a simple matter. We can use the Groovy extensions to File and Path to also immediately create contents for the files. If we want to use the extensions to Path we must make sure we include org.apache.groovy:groovy-nio as dependency to our test runtime classpath. The FileSystemFixture class also has the method copyFromClasspath that we can use to copy files and their content directory into our newly created directory structure.

Since Spock 2.1 we have 2 new operators we can use for assertions to check collections: =~ and ==~. We can use these operators with implementations of the Iterable interface when we want to check that a given collection has the same elements as an expected collection and we don’t care about the order of the elements. Without the new operators we would have to cast our collections to a Set first and than use the == operator.

Testing classes that work with date calculations based on the current date and time (now) can be difficult. First of all we must make sure our class under test accepts a java.time.Clock instance. This allows us to provide a specific Clock instance in our tests where we can define for example a fixed value, so our tests don’t break when the actual date and time changes. But this can still not be enough for classes that will behave different based on the value returned for now. The Clock instances in Java are immutable, so it is not possible to change the date or time for a Clock instance.

In Spock 2.0 we can use the new MutableClock class in our specifications to have a Clock that can be used to go forward or backward in time on the same Clock instance. We can create a MutableClock and pass it to the class under test. We can test the class with the initial date and time of the Clock object, then change the date and time for the clock and test the class again without having to create a new instance of the class under test. This is handy in situations like a queue implementation, where a message delivery date could be used to see if messages need to be delivered or not. By changing the date and time of the clock that is passed to the queue implementation we can write specifications that can check the functionality of the queue instance.

In Spock we can also get a hold on the arguments that are passed to method call of a mock and we can write assertions to check the parameters for certain conditions.

When we create a mock in Spock and invoke a method on the mock the arguments are matched using the equals() implementation of the argument type. If they are not equal Spock will tell us by showing a message that there are too few invocations of the method call. Let’s show this with an example. First we create some classes we want to test: